3-32
Ketofol (ketamine/propofol) as a superior sedative agent to mitigate cardiorespiratory effects and alleviate pain when used for procedural sedation and analgesia: a review
Authors: Papageorgiou L, Staikou Ch
Number of views: 42
Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is often necessary in order to deal with anxiety, pain and stress that may accompany patients at the hospital during invasive, unpleasant and/or painful procedures. The literature has not presented firm conclusions regarding ideal sedative agents in terms of efficacy and safety in PSA or even present firm data regarding superiority of specific drugs over others which are considered the “gold-standard” in sedation (i.e. propofol). Ketofol is a combination of ketamine and propofol and is considered by many health-care professionals to cause less respiratory suppression and haemodynamic instability, ensuring better analgesia and often amnesia, and possibly improved patient satisfaction.
We reviewed the existing evidence regarding superiority of ketofol in mitigating cardiorespiratory effects when administered as a main agent for PSA in comparison to other drugs administered for such purposes underlying the safety and efficacy profile of this cocktail medication. We conducted three times an advanced Pubmed research using the following terms: “ketofol” or “ketamine and propofol” and “sedati*” and “analgesia or pain” in “Title/Abstract” of articles using filters, such as “clinical study”, “clinical trial”, “controlled clinical trial”, “meta-analysis”, “multicentre study”, “randomised controlled trial”, “review”, “systematic review”, “comparative study”, “observational study” in English language and in population of “Adult: 19+ years”. We found 46 articles appropriate to be included in this review.
We found limited evidence to support superiority of ketofol compared to other agents, specifically to propofol, the “gold-standard” drug in sedation; undoubtedly, propofol frequently leads to respiratory suppression, hypotension and bradycardia. It seems that the addition of ketamine to propofol in sub-dissociative doses is associated with less respiratory and haemodynamic complications during PSA, while achieving adequate analgesia and deeper sedation, possibly more amnesia and consequently high satisfaction in both patients and health-care professionals. Frequent side-effects of ketofol, such as increased psychomimetic complications, nausea and vomiting and perhaps more prolonged recovery do not outweigh its potential benefits during PSA. Therefore, we consider that it represents a good choice for PSA, especially in specific populations. Further research with large, well designed, randomised clinical trials is necessary to extract firm conclusions regarding superiority of ketofol against other agents used for PSA