12
REFLECTIONS ON THE REFLECTIVE PRACTITIONER: INVESTIGATING OUR OWN PRACTICES
Authors: Tony LUXON
Number of views: 256
Many of us have experienced initial teacher training, a period in which we are
required, in a structured way, to explore methods and approaches to teaching in our
subject area. Although this is certainly a tough time (I can remember teaching only
a couple of hours a day during teaching practice during my initial teacher training,
then coming home and sleeping for twelve hours as I was so exhausted by the sheer
nervous effort involved), we learn an enormous amount from it. However, this in
itself is not sufficient for our professional development. It is only when we enter
the profession as a certified teacher or academic that we really begin to develop
professional practices based in the reality of the situation, and we undergo (some
might say endure) a period of hopefully, continuing professional development.
Lave and Wenger (1991) refer to the early period of professional activity within a
particular community of practice as ‘legitimate peripheral participation’. That is,
we enter into this community of practice at its borders and learn from others, and
from our own experience, and this is a necessary and unavoidable process if we are
to become part of the profession. It can be argued however, that this process never
ends, even when we are no longer in a sense ‘peripheral’, and we have emerged
from our apprenticeship, we are in a continuing process of ‘becoming’, and we
never stop learning. This may sound a slightly disturbing concept, in that we may
never reach wholeness, but I would suggest that it is rather an exciting process of continuous change and development, and even though we are teachers, we are also
permanently learners, gaining new experiences, experimenting with new
techniques and approaches, encountering different students.
This paper is concerned with ways that we, as teachers, can develop our own
practice through a continual process of reflection and investigation as part of our
day to day teaching activity. It suggests that professional development, especially
that aspect in which we are investigating our own teaching and learning, wrestles
with the same, or very similar epistemological and ontological issues as research in
this area.