Perspektif

81-93

Authors: Andre Azka Hanifan, Sudahnan

The transfer of some of the work to another company permitted by the Act No.13 of 2003 onEmployment as stipulated in Article 64 through Article 66, and the power over the workers’ status clarified in the Decision of the Constitutional Court. System penyerahaan 27/PUU-IX/2011 about some of the work toWork services provider company then followed up by the Minister of Manpower No. 19 of 2012 on Submission Requirements partial implementation of the Employment of Other. Company Full Service Provider is responsible for the existence of outsourced workers even though his company in a state of bankruptcy or bankruptcy, and workers still get legal protection despite outsourcing workers concerneddo the job with Specific Time Work Agreement. Methods This study used a normative juridical method, the conceptual approach and the conceptual approach approach approach approach statute legislation. The conclusion of this research Workers Services Provider Company in a state of bankruptcy should still be accountable to the outsourced workers who perform labor agreement until a certain time limit specified time and labor overstill obtain legal protection as determined by law.

104-114

Authors: Umi Supraptiningsih

The establishment of Law of Number 11, 2012 about the system of children penal judgment (government gazette 2012 number 153 and additional government gazette number 5332, abbreviated UU-SPPA) is “a hope” for children facing the law both as doers or victims to get their rights. The important thing arranged in UU-SPPA is the completion of children penal from penal judgment process out of penal judgment. There are two aspects to prepare in establishing UU-SPPA, namely physical and non physical. The local governmet has to prepare the institutions such as Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak, Lembaga Penempatan Anak Sementara, Lembaga Penyelenggaraan Kesejahteraan Sosial. This law accomodates children interest and protection that has given the completion of children cases facing the law. While the dominant inhibiting factor is in UU-SPPA its self since there are so many rules that need technical instructions to implement, such as the rule of diversion procedure. If the diversion is a mandate in UU-SPPA and the new institutions are not available so it will make the establishment of diversion facing obstacle. Moreover, if there is no children law holder, the mandate of SPPA will not also be implemented.

125-136

Authors: Riko Eka Kusuma

Since the enactment of Law No. 12 Year 2008 on The Second Amendment to Law Number 32 Year 2004 on Regional Government, as an interpretation of Article 18, to bring new changes in governance in the region. This law has fundamentally changed the practices of government, one of which is related to the position, duties and functions of the District. The changes were brought as a result of changing the shape of the organization, financing, charging personnel, logistics fulfillment and accountability, in addition to changes in the definition of the township itself. Previously, the District is an administrative region in the context of the work environment that is deconcentration government that organizes the implementation of tasks in the area of public administration, while according to Law No. 12 of 2008, Article 126 Section 3, that the District is the district/city in the context of the principle of decentralization. That is, if used within the framework of the principle of deconcentration districts is one of the administrative area, in addition to national, provincial, district and municipality, as well as administrative city. However, at the present time is the working area of the districts of the region. It can be said also that districts not a territory, but district sareservice areas.