180-191
ARE THE MANIPULATION OF AN EVENT AND THE ARRANGED BETS (art.2421 AND 2422 OF THE PENAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA) CORRUPTION OFFENSES?
Authors: Gheorghe RENIȚĂ
Number of views: 615
This scientific paper aims to give answers to its own introductory question: are the manipulation of an event and the arranged bets (article 2421 and 2422 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova (CC RM)) corruption offenses? In other words, is it justified to be included the above mentioned offenses to the group of corruption offenses? The starting point for the development of this investigation was the Draft Law no.268/2016 which, inter alia, aims to incorporate art.2421 and 2422 of the CC RM among the corruption offenses. In this regard, it is noted that the deed expressed in encouraging, influencing or training a participant at a sporting event or at a betting event to take actions that could produce a flawed legal effect upon that event, with the aim of achieving goods, services, privileges or advantages in any form, that he should not have had obtained for him or for any other person (art.2421 of the CC RM), as well as the act of betting on a sporting event or any other event that involves betting, or to inform others about the existence of an agreement on tricking that event with the intention of getting them to participate in that bet, made by a person which does not certainty know about the existence of an agreement about tricking that event (art.2422 of the PC RM), cannot be qualified in the content of norms that establish criminal liability for passive corruption (art.324 of the CC RM), active corruption (art.335 of the CC RM), influence peddling (art.326 of the CC RM), bribery (art.333 and 334 of the CC RM). This is due to the fact that the above-mentioned norms have different scopes. In order to ascribe a criminal offense to the category of corruption crimes, it is necessary for such an offense to have the defining characteristics of corruption, namely: to affect the normal exertion of the function; to imply usage by the subject of acts of corruption or acts of corrupt behaviour of his official position; to be manifested through requesting, receiving or accepting, directly or indirectly, for himself or for another person, undue material benefits or advantages; to be able to express itself through illegal promising, offering or giving of such undue benefits or advantages to the subjects of acts of corruption. Therefore, the criminal offenses set forth by art. 2421 and 2422 of the CC RM do not have the defining characteristics of corruption, as their individual traits set them apart from corruption crimes. Also, it is shown that the same conclusion results from the text of the Council of Europe Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions of September the 18th, 2014, as well as from the statutes of certain sports organisations that regulate disciplinary liability for violating sports ethics. Finally, it is emphasized that the concept of ascribing crimes concerning manipulation of an event and arranged bets is not substantiated and shall be relinquished.