2
Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects Caused by Different Rotary Ni-ti Instruments: A In Vitro Study
Authors: Dr. Smita Sahni1, Dr. Anil K. Tomer2, Dr. Shobhit Kumar Pyasi3
Number of views: 463
Aim: This study was carried out to compare the dentinal defects induced by three different rotary file system 2 shape (Micro-Mega, Besancon, Cedex,
France), Neolix (Neolix, châtres-la-Forêt, France) and Protaper universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland).
Materials & Methods: Eighty single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected based on predetermined criteria. Twenty teeth were left unprepared and
served as a negative control(Group I) .The remaining sixty teeth was divided into three groups: Group II (Pro taper universal), group III (neolix) and
group IV(2 Shape). Biomechanical preparation was carried out as per the manufacturer's instructions. After root canal preparation, all of the roots were
sectioned perpendicular to the long axis at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex. These sections were visualized under stereo microscope to evaluate the dentinal
defects using predetermined criteria. The absence/presence of cracks was recorded, and the data were analyzed with a chi-square test. The significance
level was set at P = 0.05.
Results: Roots prepared with ProTaper Universal showed maximum defects, whereas no significant difference was found in dentinal defects in roots
prepared with neolix and 2 shape files. There was statistically significant difference between the Protaper group and other two groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: All of the NiTi files tested in the present study were found to cause dentinal defect.Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in root
dentinal crack formation between 2 shape and Neolix rotary systems.