Perspektif

138-149

Authors: Dwi Tatak Subagiyo

This research was intended to review and analyze the claim refusal by PT Alianz to Handoyo which is legally justified, it was also intended to analyze the remedy done by Handoyo to get the claim for his loss. Based on this research conclusions, claim refusal by PT Allianz which is filled by Handoyo was not justified by law, because PT Allianz doesn’t admit the related insurance policy. In has been clearly stated in the substance of the related insurance policy that the loss was guaranteed by the insurance company. It means that non disclosure of facts was included a loss that is guaranteed by the insurance as stated in the insurance policy, and therefore PT Allianz can’t use it as a basis to deny the insured claim. Secondly, Handoyo’s remedy was to peacefully resolve the issue of the claim refusal by PT Allianz, because PT Allianz can not unilaterally did the policy cancellation, because it has been tied to an insurance agreement with Handoyo and the agreement meets the terms and conditions of insurance agreements, besides, Handoyo also imposes the PT Allianz to pay the insurance claims along with the cost replacement, damages and interest.

162-172

Authors: Himawan Estu Bagijo

Government administrator are often called the executive, but its not quite enough to be declared as the executive power that were labeled law enforcement. Executive in broad sense has more authority than just an implementer, the executive power in another terms is called bestuur, it have the authority to make the rules, binding personnel, organize and implement the subsidy and also perform an instrument control. The use of authority by government administrators should be directed, in order to the insufficient of people legal protection. Also specifically able to fulfill the dutys that have to be done as a government. Essentially, the task of government administrators are not only to maintain their people life, but also makes their people meets their needs. It was broadly stated that protecting their people rights is as well as replenishing their people rights. Especially in East Java governance, has been done some programmed efforts to fulfill the good governance principle, this is related to human rights protection improvements. The efforts are made with due regard to the principles of accountable governance, transparent and democratic.

184-190

Authors: Ferry Irawan Febriansyah

In law politics, the authority which is given to the political elite to establish a regulation is often used as a tool to achieve their political interest. People aspirations got forgotten very often due to political elites are too busy to take care of his political party. Public interest focused on justice that provides a balance in social life. If certainty was only depended on political interest, the quality of the regulations will be doubtful. Prosperity will not be achieved if the quality of the regulations is based on the charge of political interests and not the community interests. In case of this situation, state constitution will just be such a state decoration, whereas it should be a guidance in creating regulations for the sake of certainty, fairness and benefits. Pancasila is the source of all Indonesia law sources, which means that all existing laws, regulations and policies in Indonesia must be in accordance with the values of Pancasila that count heavily on the Indonesian people.

201-211

Authors: Indrawati

Essentially, Indonesia’s development depends on how the management of the state budget Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara. The ideal management of state budget should be based on good governance principal (this principle has become a dynamic pattern of the state enforcement, towards the democracy evolvement around the world today) which is consistent with the good financial governance principle. The implementation of good financial governance into regulations related to state financial management will be able to produce a clean governance. As the implementation of the legality and legal certainty principle, the imposition of sanctions related to state financial management irregularities must be based on the provisions of laws and regulations which is featuring respect for human rights. Besides, the sanction should be granted by the competent authorities after following some certain procedures and monitoring inspection conducted by the Badan Pemeriksaan Keuangan and Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat who hold the supervisory function of state budgeting and finance monitoring as stated in the Law No. 15/2004 about Audit, Management and Financial Responsibility of State and also Law No. 15/2006 about State Audit Board.