9
Is ABO-Compatible but Non-Identical Intestinal Transplant Comparable to ABO-Identical Transplant? An Analysis of the UNOS Registry
Authors: Junchao Cai, Xin Qing, Guosheng Wu, Matthew Everly, Elaine Cheng, Paul Terasaki
Number of views: 645
ABO-compatible intestinal transplants have been more frequently performed in the US in recent years (from 4% to 16%). However, they have not been clearly shown to have comparable short- and long-term graft outcome compared to ABO-identical transplants. The US national registry database was analyzed to show the current status of ABO-compatible intestinal transplantation and to determine its effect on acute rejection and long-term graft survival. Blood type A, B, and AB patients received 11%, 26%, and 62% of ABO-compatible intestinal transplants, respectively. ABO-compatible transplant recipients experienced a higher rate of acute rejection than ABO-identical patients (77% vs. 64%, p < 0.0001). In addition, they had a significantly lower 10-year graft survival rate than ABO-identical transplant recipients (27% vs. 35%, p = 0.020). Acute rejection was the cause of graft failure in 42% of ABO-compatible and 25% of ABOidentical patients who lost intestinal transplants (p = 0.041). Since ABO-compatible transplants were associated with high rates of acute rejection and graft failure, intense induction/maintenance immunosuppressive therapies are recommended for ABO-compatible transplant recipients. In addition, packed red blood cells of donor type and plasma of recipient type, if needed, should be considered as a safer transfusion strategy for ABO-compatible transplant patients to avoid intensification of allograft injury by GVH immunity.