43-48
THE CASE OF THE BESSARABIAN HIEROMONK MINA DOBZEU – THE TESTIMONY OF A MAN’S FAITH
Authors: Maria BUŢCU
Number of views: 173
The elections won by the Communists (16 November 1946) had direct impact on all aspects of the political, economic, social, cultural, and spiritual life of Romania, given that, at the end of 1947, the constitutional monarchy is replaced by the communist regime. The Church was one of the hardest hit institutions. The irreconcilable contradiction between the atheist state and the Christian doctrine undoubtedly placed the Church outside the legal framework, condemning all Christians, regardless of denomination, to persecution that was similar to those from the beginning of the Christian era.
The church decided to avoid the conflict with the state and was focused on cooperation, this action was justified in official speeches as a sacrifice in the name of the whole society. This state of affairs caused adverse reactions from some priests, who openly disagreed with any “collaboration” between these two institutions. An example in this sense is the manifesto of the Bessarabian monk Mina Dobzeu to the representatives of the Romanian Orthodox Church, by which he urged the Orthodox clergy not to mix religious teaching with the state policy, as each institution has its responsibilities and missions on earth. The first manifesto, “Adevărul”, appears in February 1948, being multiplied into 7 copies and stuck to several fences in the village of Brădiceşti. The second, written in 13 copies, appears after more than 10 years, in May 1959, and is sent to the Orthodox hierarchs and to the leadership of the Theological Institute in Bucharest. The Bessarabian hieromonk Mina Dobzeu’s strong consistent disagreement with the policy of the atheist state, urging clerics not to submit to the regime and not to cooperate with state authorities is impressive, given that it was the subject of multiple criminal investigations by the Security. Mina Dobzeu's example is one that reflects, on an individual scale, the conflict between the Church and the power, being relevant for understanding the harsh conditions that the Church had to face. The mission of historians is to emphasise aspects and to avoid generalisations, given that the people of the Church, as well as the whole society, had different reactions that must be analysed in connection to the conjuncture conditioned by the events that took place in the country.